|
“Hey, good read yet again!
I especially enjoyed the part about finding things that went wrong, as I could relate! Our group ended up choosing things which were unrelated to the team, like the camera in the game and so on.
I would’ve loved to be reminded of the presentation and its contents through the actual slides ; your explanation was a bit brief, and seeing the slides would’ve helped me understand what you’re talking about better.
Your goal with the presentation was well communicated. For my group, we sat down and did it together, which took a while but was a good reminder of what we’ve already done and what we have yet to do.
Our group chose another game, Depth, and we haven’t shown the game to the original designers of the idea. Reading your post, I feel like that was a mistake. It would be interesting to get an idea of the fidelity of our adaptation of what is ultimately their game.
I would’ve loved to see more images, as well as to hear more about, for example, what the feedback of your team was, as the article was a bit short for the amount of content you have to explain, I feel.
Nonetheless, good job! I hope you and your team keep working so well that your primary concern is identifying what’s wrong!”
About Clément Pirelli
2017 Programming
|
