Blog Comment 5
|
Hello Michael, Well done with the blog post! The details of benefit for both playtesting sessions was clearly documented and it was interesting to see how you iterated on the survey between sessions and learned from earlier shortcomings. The reason for doing this is pretty self-evident, but you elude to it quite well to make sure the reader is completely in sync with the text. Realistically there’s not a lot I’d improve on with this article, I think some of the points you made could’ve been made more concisely to make the text more readable though. As well as this I think it is important to make the distinction between your opinions on what is correct rather than decisions that it really is. For example, “It made tons of sense to have the player fire an attack that would destroy not just 1 enemy, but formations of several enemies” can give the indication that it’s logical rather than what the group and concept document suggests. Especially if the person reading hasn’t read the concept document. Subtle changes to certain sections in those terms is about the only thing I’d point out though. Great job!  |